allnewscastallnewscast
Breaking News
Politics & Elections

Paxton’s Private Convention Assessment Collides With Trump’s Public Praise

Marcus Feld4 min read
Paxton’s Private Convention Assessment Collides With Trump’s Public Praise

Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, privately said on September 24, 2026, that President Trump’s Republican convention in Dallas had damaged his polling, according to audio obtained by The New York Times and reviewed in reports by several independent news organizations.

What did Paxton say about the convention?

Paxton made the comments at a private Washington fundraiser attended by conservative donors and lobbyists, according to The New York Times. When asked whether the president had become a drag on his Senate campaign, Paxton said the convention had lowered Republican numbers. His campaign disputes the account and says his standing improved in September.

  • “So to be honest with you, the numbers — when we did that convention — it dropped our numbers,” Paxton said on the recording, according to The New York Times.
  • “Everybody’s numbers dropped,” he added, according to the same report.
  • “Right now? Yeah, not good,” Paxton said, according to the audio account published September 30.

When and where was the Republican convention held?

The Republican Party held the midterm convention in Dallas from September 9 to September 10, 2026, according to reporting by the New York Post and the Houston Chronicle. The event was the first midterm convention of its kind for the party and placed the president at the center of the Texas Senate contest.

  • According to the New York Post, the convention ran from September 9 through September 10, 2026.
  • According to the Houston Chronicle, the president later described the convention as successful and said it helped Paxton.
  • According to the New York Times, Paxton attended a private fundraiser in Washington the following week, where the recorded discussion took place.

How did the president describe the event?

The president offered the opposite assessment several days after the Dallas gathering. Speaking to reporters in Ireland on September 13, 2026, he said the convention had helped the Texas candidate, according to the Houston Chronicle and New York Post. The public claim now conflicts with Paxton’s reported private account.

“I think the fact that we had such a successful convention really helped Ken Paxton,” the president said on September 13, according to the Houston Chronicle. He also praised Paxton’s record as attorney general, the newspaper reported.

What is Paxton’s campaign saying?

Paxton’s campaign rejected the interpretation of the recording. Nick Maddux, a senior adviser, accused The New York Times of presenting a manipulated account and said independent polling showed improvement after early September. The response did not include a public recording of Paxton making a different statement about the convention.

  • “This is more manipulated nonsense from The New York Times to create a story that doesn’t exist,” Maddux said, according to a statement quoted by Forbes.
  • Maddux said “every serious pollster” would report that Paxton’s numbers had improved since early September, according to Forbes.
  • The audio was supplied to The New York Times by an attendee who opposed Paxton’s campaign and was granted anonymity, according to the newspaper’s account cited by the Boston Globe.

How was the private meeting verified?

The recording came from a gathering of roughly a dozen people, according to The New York Times and the Boston Globe. The person who provided the audio was not publicly identified. Three other people familiar with the event confirmed Paxton attended, while two recalled that he was asked about the convention and one recalled the negative assessment.

Those confirmations support the account of the meeting, but they do not independently establish the accuracy of every word on the recording. The campaign’s denial creates a dispute over the political meaning of Paxton’s remarks, not over the fact that the fundraiser took place.

Why does the recording matter in the Texas Senate race?

The recording exposes a direct disagreement between the Republican nominee’s private remarks and the president’s public message. Paxton is running against Democratic state Representative James Talarico in a closely watched race, according to Forbes. The dispute also places the candidate’s relationship with the White House at the center of the campaign.

  • According to Forbes, Paxton has received the president’s endorsement.
  • According to Forbes, James Talarico is Paxton’s Democratic opponent.
  • According to The Hill, Paxton is the Republican nominee for the Texas Senate seat.

The political question is whether voters respond more strongly to the Dallas convention itself, the leaked recording, or the campaign’s rebuttal. The published reports do not provide a single agreed poll showing precisely how the event changed the race.

What happens next for Paxton’s campaign?

Paxton must now defend his campaign’s public alignment with the president while explaining remarks that appeared to blame the convention for a decline in Republican polling. The campaign has pointed to later September numbers, but the reports available on September 30 do not identify a common polling average or provide a full before-and-after measurement.

The recording is likely to remain an issue as the Senate contest moves forward. It gives Democrats an argument that the Republican nominee privately doubts the value of the president’s political operation. It also gives Republican rivals a reason to question whether Paxton can manage pressure from the White House and the Texas electorate at the same time.

Sources

  1. 1.nytimes.com
  2. 2.bostonglobe.com
  3. 3.forbes.com
  4. 4.nj.com
  5. 5.usatoday.com
  6. 6.chron.com
  7. 7.thehill.com
  8. 8.washingtonexaminer.com
  9. 9.politicalwire.com
  10. 10.nytimes.com
  11. 11.alternet.org
  12. 12.nypost.com
  13. 13.ibtimes.co.uk
  14. 14.nytimes.com
  15. 15.dailymail.com

Read more →

Related Articles

Paxton’s Private Convention Assessment Collides With Trump’s Public Praise
Politics & Elections

Paxton’s Private Convention Assessment Collides With Trump’s Public Praise

Ken Paxton , the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, privately said on September 24, 2026, that President Trump ’s Republican convention in Dallas had damaged his polling, according to audio obtained by The New York Times and reviewed in reports by several independent news organizations. What did Paxton say about the convention? Paxton made the comments at a private Washington fundraiser attended by conservative donors and lobbyists, according to The New York Times . When asked whether the president had become a drag on his Senate campaign, Paxton said the convention had lowered Republican numbers. His campaign disputes the account and says his standing improved in September. “So to be honest with you, the numbers — when we did that convention — it dropped our numbers,” Paxton said on the recording, according to The New York Times . “Everybody’s numbers dropped,” he added, according to the same report. “Right now? Yeah, not good,” Paxton said, according to the audio account published September 30. When and where was the Republican convention held? The Republican Party held the midterm convention in Dallas from September 9 to September 10, 2026, according to reporting by the New York Post and the Houston Chronicle . The event was the first midterm convention of its kind for the party and placed the president at the center of the Texas Senate contest. According to the New York Post , the convention ran from September 9 through September 10, 2026. According to the Houston Chronicle , the president later described the convention as successful and said it helped Paxton. According to the New York Times , Paxton attended a private fundraiser in Washington the following week, where the recorded discussion took place. How did the president describe the event? The president offered the opposite assessment several days after the Dallas gathering. Speaking to reporters in Ireland on September 13, 2026, he said the convention had helped the Texas candidate, according to the Houston Chronicle and New York Post . The public claim now conflicts with Paxton’s reported private account. “I think the fact that we had such a successful convention really helped Ken Paxton,” the president said on September 13, according to the Houston Chronicle . He also praised Paxton’s record as attorney general, the newspaper reported. What is Paxton’s campaign saying? Paxton’s campaign rejected the interpretation of the recording. Nick Maddux, a senior adviser, accused The New York Times of presenting a manipulated account and said independent polling showed improvement after early September. The response did not include a public recording of Paxton making a different statement about the convention. “This is more manipulated nonsense from The New York Times to create a story that doesn’t exist,” Maddux said, according to a statement quoted by Forbes . Maddux said “every serious pollster” would report that Paxton’s numbers had improved since early September, according to Forbes . The audio was supplied to The New York Times by an attendee who opposed Paxton’s campaign and was granted anonymity, according to the newspaper’s account cited by the Boston Globe . How was the private meeting verified? The recording came from a gathering of roughly a dozen people, according to The New York Times and the Boston Globe . The person who provided the audio was not publicly identified. Three other people familiar with the event confirmed Paxton attended, while two recalled that he was asked about the convention and one recalled the negative assessment. Those confirmations support the account of the meeting, but they do not independently establish the accuracy of every word on the recording. The campaign’s denial creates a dispute over the political meaning of Paxton’s remarks, not over the fact that the fundraiser took place. Why does the recording matter in the Texas Senate race? The recording exposes a direct disagreement between the Republican nominee’s private remarks and the president’s public message. Paxton is running against Democratic state Representative James Talarico in a closely watched race, according to Forbes . The dispute also places the candidate’s relationship with the White House at the center of the campaign. According to Forbes , Paxton has received the president’s endorsement. According to Forbes , James Talarico is Paxton’s Democratic opponent. According to The Hill , Paxton is the Republican nominee for the Texas Senate seat. The political question is whether voters respond more strongly to the Dallas convention itself, the leaked recording, or the campaign’s rebuttal. The published reports do not provide a single agreed poll showing precisely how the event changed the race. What happens next for Paxton’s campaign? Paxton must now defend his campaign’s public alignment with the president while explaining remarks that appeared to blame the convention for a decline in Republican polling. The campaign has pointed to later September numbers, but the reports available on September 30 do not identify a common polling average or provide a full before-and-after measurement. The recording is likely to remain an issue as the Senate contest moves forward. It gives Democrats an argument that the Republican nominee privately doubts the value of the president’s political operation. It also gives Republican rivals a reason to question whether Paxton can manage pressure from the White House and the Texas electorate at the same time.

Marcus Feld·
x.ai Widens Grok Bot Access Across SuperGrok and Cursor Tiers
AI & Tech

x.ai Widens Grok Bot Access Across SuperGrok and Cursor Tiers

x.ai has broadened access to its automation assistant Grok Bot , bundling the tool into a wider set of SuperGrok and Cursor subscriptions and removing the need for a standalone bot plan for many users. Grok Bot moves from niche add-on to mainstream bundle Initially, Grok Bot access was marketed as a premium perk tied primarily to high-end tiers such as SuperGrok Heavy , Cursor Ultra , and certain premium team seats. Those plans targeted power users willing to pay between roughly $200 and $300 per month individually or about $120 per seat for teams. This limited the bot’s reach to a relatively small segment of professional and enterprise customers. As of late August 2026, x.ai and ecosystem partners have expanded that list substantially. Grok Bot is now included with a broader set of consumer and developer-oriented plans, as well as more affordable team tiers, positioning the bot as a standard part of the Grok stack rather than a niche upsell. Which plans now include Grok Bot? According to recent plan documentation and partner briefings, Grok Bot access is now bundled into the following categories of subscriptions: SuperGrok tiers with bot access : In addition to the long-standing inclusion in SuperGrok Heavy , Grok Bot is now listed as an included feature for SuperGrok Plus , a mid-tier plan positioned above the standard $30 SuperGrok subscription. Cursor individual plans : Grok Bot is bundled with Cursor Pro+ and Cursor Ultra , giving solo developers and advanced users bot-driven workflow automation and coding assistance as part of their core IDE-linked subscription. Cursor team plans : Both Cursor Teams Standard and Cursor Teams Premium now include Grok Bot, extending automated project and code management capabilities to multi-seat environments at approximately $40 per seat for Standard and around $120 per seat for Premium. A blog post focused on Grok Bot’s role in the ecosystem notes that, as of August 22, 2026, eligible plans include Cursor Pro+ , SuperGrok Plus , Cursor Ultra , SuperGrok Heavy , and both Cursor Teams Standard and Premium . Another update describing Vertex AI integration reiterates that Grok Bot is now available via SuperGrok Plus, Cursor Pro+, all Cursor Teams tiers, Cursor Ultra, and SuperGrok Heavy, with a new free trial option for those outside these plans. Pricing context: from $40/seat to $300 a month The expansion comes amid a broader clarification of Grok’s consumer and professional pricing. Grok’s core chat product spans a free tier and several paid levels, including SuperGrok Lite at around $10 per month, SuperGrok at roughly $30 per month, SuperGrok Plus at about $100 per month, and SuperGrok Heavy at the $300 per month level. On the developer side, Cursor offers Pro and Ultra subscriptions and team seats. Cursor Pro+ is described as the cheapest individual route to Grok Bot, at approximately $60 per month, with weekly usage for the bot included. Cursor Ultra, around $200 per month, has been one of the earliest widely referenced “doors” to Grok Bot, particularly for users linking their Grok accounts directly with Cursor for integrated AI coding support. For organizations, Cursor Teams Standard at about $40 per seat per month and Cursor Teams Premium at roughly $120 per seat now provide bundled Grok Bot access for each seat, bringing the automation assistant directly into shared repositories and collaborative workflows. No standalone Grok Bot subscription – yet Despite the expanded eligibility list, Grok Bot remains a bundled product rather than a standalone subscription. Several pricing analyses note that, as of late August 2026, there is still no separate Grok Bot-only tier; instead, bot access is packaged into the higher-value SuperGrok, Cursor, and team plans. This bundling strategy aligns Grok Bot with x.ai’s wider approach to Grok monetization, which uses different paths – direct SuperGrok plans, social bundles such as X Premium and X Premium+, and developer tools like Cursor – rather than selling each capability as an independent subscription. Free trial and access pathways For users not ready to commit to the mid- or high-tier plans, x.ai has introduced a 7-day Grok Bot free trial with limited usage. The trial requires a credit card to activate but does not automatically convert to a paid subscription unless the user explicitly opts to continue. This gives prospective customers an opportunity to test bot capabilities inside their workflows without immediately moving to SuperGrok Plus, Heavy, or Cursor Ultra and team tiers. Alongside the trial, Grok continues to be available through the main Grok app and through X-platform bundles such as X Premium and X Premium+, which provide different levels of access to Grok’s flagship models but do not, in most cases, advertise Grok Bot as a core feature. What the expansion means for users Analysts tracking AI subscription pricing argue that bundling Grok Bot with more mid-range and team plans could significantly increase usage, particularly among developers and small teams who might have balked at the $300 SuperGrok Heavy price tag. By anchoring bot access to plans such as SuperGrok Plus and Cursor Pro+, x.ai effectively lowers the entry point for automation-centric use cases while preserving a clear premium tier for the highest-volume customers. For individual power users, the inclusion of Grok Bot in SuperGrok Plus provides a bridge between the more affordable $30 SuperGrok tier and the $300 Heavy plan, adding bot access, higher usage ceilings, and priority at peak times without requiring an enterprise-scale budget. Developers relying on Cursor gain more direct integration, with Pro+ and Ultra seats now offering bot workflows alongside code completion and analysis features. Teams, meanwhile, can roll out Grok Bot across collaborative environments through Standard and Premium seats rather than confining bot access to a few high-cost power users. Pricing observers note that this could shift the perception of Grok Bot from a specialist tool to a standard part of AI-enabled software development and operations stacks. Ongoing evolution of Grok’s subscription model The move to include Grok Bot with more plans fits into a wider pattern of rapid iteration in Grok’s pricing and packaging. Over the past months, x.ai has added intermediate tiers like SuperGrok Plus, refined usage pools and model access, and clarified how Grok integrates with external platforms such as Vertex AI and Cursor. Commentary from pricing trackers suggests the current configuration is unlikely to be final; as user behavior and workload patterns evolve, x.ai may continue to rebalance which tiers feature Grok Bot and how much usage each plan includes. For now, however, customers on SuperGrok Plus, SuperGrok Heavy, Cursor Pro+, Cursor Ultra, and Cursor Teams plans stand to benefit from the broadened inclusion of Grok Bot without needing to manage a separate subscription.

Nic Reeve·
AInews: Google’s Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash Extends AI Video Scenes to 40 Seconds in 4K
AI & Tech

AInews: Google’s Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash Extends AI Video Scenes to 40 Seconds in 4K

On August 27, 2026, Google released Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, a production-ready AI video model that can generate and extend clips to 40 seconds and finish them in 4K, marking one of the most aggressive upgrades yet in AI video tooling under the AInews umbrella. What exactly did Google launch with Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash? Google shipped Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash as its new multimodal video generation model, focused on control rather than just raw image quality. The release adds scene extension, keyframe-based transitions, 360p draft rendering and upscaling to 1080p and 4K for developers using the Gemini API and Google AI products. The model is positioned as Google’s main production video engine in the Gemini stack, replacing earlier builds that were limited in both context and resolution. According to Google’s official blog, Omni now supports "studio-quality video production" with tools aimed at editors and product teams rather than just experimentation. Launch date: August 27, 2026, as a production update to Google’s Gemini video line. Model name: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, available through the Gemini API and Google AI services. Core focus: More control over scenes, transitions and resolution, rather than only improving raw generation quality. Supported output resolutions: 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K via upscaling. How does the new scene extension system work and why is 40 seconds important? Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash introduces a stateful scene extension system that reads up to 10 seconds of prior footage and extends clips in 10-second blocks, with a total cap of 40 seconds. That shift makes multi-shot sequences and continuous camera moves possible inside the model for the first time. Earlier Google video systems such as Veo only looked at the final second of a clip before creating a continuation, which often broke motion or lighting consistency. Omni 1.1 lifts that “one-second wall.” It analyses a longer segment of the existing video so the continuation can preserve framing, movement and style. Base clip length: 3–10 seconds per generation, according to Google’s developer documentation. Prior context for extension: Up to 10 seconds of earlier footage instead of just the last second. Extension increments: 10-second chunks stacked through an editing session. Maximum cumulative length: 40 seconds per scene when extensions are chained. Several developer guides describe this as a "stateful editing session" where each extension call references a previous interaction ID, meaning the model tracks continuity over multiple steps rather than treating every prompt from scratch. What does 4K finishing actually mean for creators and developers? Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash does not render native 4K from scratch but uses upscaling to lift generated footage to 1080p or 4K. Drafts can be produced quickly at 360p to cut iteration time and cost, then finalized in high resolution for delivery. Google’s blog states that Omni can now generate "polished, high-resolution 1080p or 4K outputs that are ready for professional production," with 4K delivered through an upscaling pass. The Gemini API changelog confirms a new resolution parameter covering 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Draft mode resolution: 360p, described by Google as up to 60 percent faster than 720p and roughly a third of the cost. Standard generation: 720p clips at normal price and speed. High-resolution finishing: Upscaled 1080p and 4K for final delivery. Indicative pricing: One analysis cites $0.03 per second at 360p, $0.10 at 720p, $0.15 at 1080p and $0.30 for 4K, based on Gemini API rate tables. Those price figures come from third-party coverage of Google’s documentation and reseller listings, which caution that high-resolution production budgets should be treated as provisional until Google updates its official pricing page. What new controls does Omni 1.1 Flash offer over motion and style? The update adds start and end keyframe control, short video references and cleaner motion trajectories. These features give creators ways to specify camera moves, preserve character design and carry stylistic continuity across multiple shots without manual post-production work. Several technical breakdowns describe a workflow where the user supplies a first and last frame, and the model generates the motion between those two points. That unlocks controlled orbits, zooms and loops that previously required hand-crafted animation or external tools. First and last frame transitions: The model interpolates motion between defined frames, improving control over camera paths. Video references: Up to three seconds of external footage can be attached as a style reference for characters or motion. Motion quality: Coverage from specialist sites reports "cleaner motions" and fewer artifacts compared with earlier Omni builds, based on early tests. Multimodal input: Omni Flash works with text prompts plus images or short video clips inside the Gemini API. Where is Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash available and who can use it today? Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is live in the Gemini API and in Google AI products targeting developers and advanced users. It is available to paid Gemini tiers and appears in enterprise-focused platforms used for agents and workflow automation. According to Google and independent documentation, Omni 1.1 Flash can be called from: Gemini API: Exposed as gemini-omni-1.1-flash with video-specific configuration options. Google AI Plus, Pro and Ultra subscriptions: The model is enabled in Flow, Google’s structured AI environment, and supports scene extension in the Gemini app. Enterprise agent platforms: Google’s cloud docs list Omni 1.1 Flash among supported models for agent workflows with video capabilities. Third-party resellers and toolkits: Several integration guides map Omni Flash into routing layers and developer dashboards. Public posts from Google AI and independent researchers on social platforms confirm the rollout, citing the model’s scene extension to 40 seconds, support for 1080p and 4K, and a 360p draft mode designed to make experimentation cheaper.

Nic Reeve·